4.7 Article

Influence of cultivar and of conventional and organic agricultural practices on phenolic and sensory profile of blackberries (Rubus fruticosus)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages 4616-4624

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8990

Keywords

blackberry chemical composition; agricultural practice; phenolic profile; antioxidant activity; sensory profile

Funding

  1. FCT [PEst-OE/QUI/UI0616/2014]
  2. COMPETE [PEst-OE/QUI/UI0616/2014]
  3. European Investment Funds by FEDER/COMPETE/POCI - Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958]
  4. FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/AGR/04033/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Consumer demand for organic products is increasing because of their claimed health benefits. Blackberries are a rich source of polyphenols, with high antioxidant activity; nevertheless, the impact of organic versus conventional agricultural practices on its phytochemical composition is unknown. 'Loch Ness' and 'Chester Thornless' were selected as blackberry cultivars for this study because of their desired sensory and technological properties, which make them more suitable for export. RESULTS: 'Loch Ness' variety presented a higher amounts of polyphenols and higher antioxidant activity when compared to the 'Chester Thornless' variety. The impact of agricultural practices on the phytochemical composition of the two varieties was contradictory. Under organic agricultural practices, levels of polyphenols increased for 'Loch Ness' and decreased for 'Chester Thornless', whereas the soluble solids content increased in both varieties. These changes in composition were correlated with changes observed in the blackberries' sensory profile. CONCLUSION: The effect of agricultural practices on the blackberries' chemical and sensory profile was dependent on the variety and cannot be generalized. (C) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available