4.3 Article

The contributions of paradata and features of respondents, interviewers and survey agencies to panel co-operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12391

Keywords

Attrition; Field practices; Interviewer effects; Panel data; Paradata

Funding

  1. European Commission through the fifth framework programme [QLK6-CT-2001-00360]
  2. European Commission through sixth framework programme (project SHARE-I3) [RII-CT-2006-062193]
  3. European Commission through sixth framework programme (project COMPARE) [CIT5-CT-2005-028857]
  4. European Commission through sixth framework programme (project SHARELIFE) [CIT4-CT-2006-028812]
  5. European Commission through seventh framework programme [SHARE-PREP 211909, SHARE-LEAP 227822, SHARE M4 261982]
  6. US National Institute on Aging [U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, R21 AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG BSR06-11, OGHA 04-064]
  7. German Ministry of Education and Research
  8. ESRC [ES/M010147/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper deals with panel co-operation in a cross-national, fully harmonized face-to-face survey. Our outcome of interest is panel co-operation in the fourth wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Following a multilevel approach, we focus on the contribution of paradata at three levels: fieldwork strategies at the survey agency level, features of the (current) interviewer and paradata describing respondents' interview experience from the previous wave. Our results highlight the importance of respondents' prior interview experience, and of interviewers' quality of work and experience. We also find that survey agency practice matters: daily communication between fieldwork co-ordinators and interviewers is positively associated with panel co-operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available