4.6 Article

Inversion of friction anisotropy in a bioinspired asymmetrically structured surface

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 15, Issue 138, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0629

Keywords

friction anisotropy; asymmetric topography; stiffness; roughness; aspect ratio

Funding

  1. CARBTRIB Project of The Leverhulme Trust
  2. Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) [RGP0002/2017]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation in China [51275237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Friction anisotropy is an important property of many surfaces that usually facilitate the generation of motion in a preferred direction. Such surfaces are very common in biological systems and have been the templates for various bio-inspired materials with similar tribological properties. So far friction anisotropy is considered to be the result of an asymmetric arrangement of surface nano-and microstructures. However, here we show by using bioinspired sawtooth-structured surfaces that the anisotropic friction properties are not only controlled by an asymmetric surface topography, but also by the ratio of the sample-substrate stiffness, the aspect ratio of surface structures, and by the substrate roughness. Systematically modifying these parameters, we were able to demonstrate a broad range of friction anisotropies, and for specific sample-substrate combinations even an inversion of the anisotropy. This result highlights the complex interrelation between the different material and topographical parameters on friction properties and sheds new light on the conventional design paradigm of tribological systems. Finally, this result is also of great importance for understanding functional principles of biological materials and surfaces, as such inversion of friction anisotropy may correlate with gait pattern and walking behaviour in climbing animals, which in turn may be used in robotic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available