4.7 Article

Fracture toughness of soft materials with rate-independent hysteresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 341-364

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.05.020

Keywords

Fracture toughness; Crack tip field; Dissipation; Hysteresis; Mullins effect

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1752449]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fracture toughness of soft elastomers or gels can be substantially enhanced by introducing various energy dissipation mechanisms into the bulk material. Bulk dissipation, manifested in the hysteresis of loading-unloading cycles, enables the formation of a dissipation zone around the crack tip that consumes most of the energy provided by the external loading to drive crack propagation, effectively increasing the fracture toughness. An in-depth understanding on how bulk dissipation contributes to fracture toughness is required to predict crack propagation in soft materials with significant hysteresis. However, the current understanding is limited to the qualitative or empirical level due to the complex nonlinear mechanics involved in soft material fracture. This paper presents a theoretical framework for calculating the energy dissipation associated with crack propagation. To demonstrate its utility, we focus on steady state crack propagation and consider a model material system with rate-independent hysteresis: a neo-Hookean solid with Mullins effect. We determine analytical relations between fracture toughness and the parameters governing bulk hysteresis, and quantitatively predict the reduction in fracture toughness due to pre-stretch. Both agree well with finite element results. The framework presented here can be applied to a broader range of dissipative soft materials, thus providing a theoretical tool to guide the engineering of soft materials with high toughness. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available