4.6 Article

Optimization of Heat Treatment Conditions for Fabricating Pre-Lithiated Silicon Monoxide as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 165, Issue 3, Pages A603-A608

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0911803jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korean government (MEST) [NRF-2016R1A2B3009481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we compared the galvanostat- and thermal-driven electrochemical reactions occurring in lithiated silicon monoxide and found that the kinetics of the initial irreversible formation of certain phases (galvanostat-electrochemical reaction) do not agree with those of the pre-lithiation reaction between silicon monoxide and lithium metal (thermal-driven electrochemical reaction). However, thermal-driven electrochemical reactions occurring at high temperatures yielded phases similar to those formed galvanostatically, thereby reducing the initial irreversibility of cell. The kinetics of pre-lithiationwere investigated by heating a siliconmonoxide/ lithium powder mixture to 600 degrees C at heating rates of 9 degrees C min(-1) and 14 degrees C min(-1). Lithium oxide and lithium metasilicate were formed in both cases, while lithium silicate was formed only when the heating rate was 14 degrees C min(-1). The identities of these irreversibly formed products were determined by XRD, DTA and the effect of heating rate was elucidated by electrochemical tests. Pre-lithiated samples heated at rates of 9 degrees C min(-1) and 14 degrees C min(-1) exhibited initial coulombic efficiencies of 78.83% and 81.72%, respectively. These values are higher than those observed for bare silicon monoxide anodes, thus indicating that heating conditions influence the irreversible formation of the above mentioned phases and affect the irreversible capacity of silicon monoxide. (C) 2018 The Electrochemical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available