4.2 Article

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 167, Issue 11, Pages 2635-2646

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37256

Keywords

genetic counseling; genetic testing; genomic sequencing; informed consent; qualitative research

Funding

  1. NHGRI [U01 HG006546, 1U01 HG006487, U01 HG006500]
  2. NHGRI/NCI [1U01 HG006485]
  3. CSER Coordinating Center [U01 HG007307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the increased utilization of genome and exome sequencing, little is known about the actual content and process of informed consent for sequencing. We addressed this by interviewing 29 genetic counselors and research coordinators experienced in obtaining informed consent for sequencing in research and clinical settings. Interviews focused on the process and content of informed consent; patients/participants' common questions, concerns and misperceptions; and challenges to obtaining informed consent. Content analysis of transcribed interviews revealed that the main challenges to obtaining consent related to the broad scope and uncertainty of results, and patient/participants' unrealistic expectations about the likely number and utility of results. Interviewees modified their approach to sessions according to contextual issues surrounding the indication for testing, type of patient, and timing of testing. With experience, most interviewees structured sessions to place less emphasis on standard elements in the consent form and technological aspects of sequencing. They instead focused on addressing misperceptions and helping patients/participants develop realistic expectations about the types and implications of possible results, including secondary findings. These findings suggest that informed consent sessions should focus on key issues that may be misunderstood by patients/participants. Future research should address the extent to which various stakeholders agree on key elements of informed consent. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available