4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Alterations in oxidative stress markers in laryngeal carcinoma patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 81, Issue 9, Pages 811-815

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.02.004

Keywords

Antioxidants; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Oxidative stress; Paraoxonase activity

Funding

  1. Yuzuncu Yil University Research of Sciences Foundation grant [2015-FEN-B303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data describing how laryngeal cancer affects oxidative stress markers and antioxidants are limited. This study investigated serum antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative stress markers before and after laryngectomies in patients with laryngeal cancer. Methods: A total of 29 patients with laryngeal cancer and 25 healthy control subjects were enrolled. Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx), catalase (CAT), paraoxonase (PON), and arylesterase activities were measured spectrophotometrically. Blood samples were obtained from each patient just before surgery and 1 month after a laryngectomy. Results: The serum PON, arylesterase, CAT, SOD, and GSHPx activities were significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) and serum MDA levels were significantly increased (p < 0.001) in patients with laryngeal cancer, compared with control subjects. In laryngeal cancer patients, the serum GSHPx and arylesterase activity levels increased significantly following laryngectomies (both p < 0.001), whereas the MDA levels decreased significantly (p = 0.007). Conclusion: In patients with laryngeal cancer, the oxidant/antioxidant balance shifted toward oxidative stress. In addition, following laryngectomies, laryngeal cancer patients had increases in serum antioxidant enzyme activities and decreases in oxidative stress markers. Copyright (C) 2018, the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available