4.3 Article

Enrolling Pregnant Women: Issues in Clinical Research

Journal

WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages E39-E45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.10.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 OD999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite the fact that many pregnant women are affected by a range of serious health conditions and take medications for these conditions, there is widespread reticence to include them in clinical intervention research. Hence, their clinical care is typically not informed by evidence derived from pregnant populations. Method: In October 2010, the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health convened a workshop to address ethical, regulatory, and scientific issues raised by the enrollment of pregnant women in clinical research. This report summarizes three areas that emerged from that meeting as important next steps to be taken to promote ethically responsible and scientifically sound research during pregnancy. Findings: The three areas are: 1) Reclassify pregnant women from their current status in regulations as a vulnerable population to a scientifically complex population and change the presumption of exclusion to one of inclusion; 2) examine the institutional review boards' (IRB) gatekeeper role in interpreting regulations governing pregnancy research and identify steps to facilitate IRB approval of ethically informed pregnancy research; and 3) develop a pregnancy-focused research agenda that addresses pressing clinical needs, identifies opportunities to gather information from existing resources and studies, and encourages important new research areas. Conclusion: Research is needed to address the therapeutic needs of pregnant women and to study pregnancy as it may shed light on a pregnant woman's later health and the health of her child. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available