4.7 Review

2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 9, Pages 1021-1034

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.048

Keywords

cardiovascular and stroke endpoint definitions; cardiovascular and stroke outcome definitions; cardiovascular and stroke outcomes; cardiovascular endpoint definitions; cardiovascular endpoints; cardiovascular outcomes; clinical trial endpoint definitions; clinical trial endpoints; endpoint definitions; endpoints; outcome definitions; stroke endpoint definitions; stroke endpoints; stroke outcomes

Funding

  1. Afferent
  2. Amgen
  3. Apple Inc.
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Cardiva Medical Inc.
  6. Daiichi
  7. Ferring
  8. Google (Verily)
  9. Johnson Johnson
  10. Luitpold
  11. Medtronic
  12. Merck
  13. Novartis
  14. Sanofi
  15. St. Jude
  16. Tenax
  17. Eli Lilly/Daiichi-Sankyo
  18. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  19. Medicines Company
  20. OrbusNeich
  21. Bayer
  22. CSL Behring
  23. Abbott Laboratories
  24. Watermark Research Partners
  25. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  26. AUM Cardiovascular, Inc.
  27. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  28. Abbvie
  29. Cerenis
  30. Eli Lilly
  31. Esperion
  32. Pfizer
  33. Orexigen
  34. Arena
  35. Eisai
  36. Aegerion
  37. Angelmed
  38. Janssen
  39. Xoma
  40. ICON Clinical
  41. Boston Clinical Research Institute
  42. Boehringer Ingelheim
  43. Alnylam
  44. Bellerophon
  45. Celladon
  46. Gilead
  47. GlaxoSmithKline
  48. Ionis Pharmaceutics
  49. Lone Star Heart
  50. Mesoblast
  51. MyoKardia
  52. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  53. Sanofi Pasteur
  54. Theracos
  55. Celyad
  56. Cytokinetics
  57. Trevena
  58. Daiichi-Sankyo
  59. Roche Diagnostics
  60. Boston Scientific
  61. CeloNova
  62. Abbott/St. Jude Medical
  63. Relypsa
  64. Cheetah Medical
  65. CSL
  66. Abiomed
  67. AUM Cardiovascular
  68. Ablative Solutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This publication describes uniform definitions for cardiovascular and stroke outcomes developed by the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA established the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative in 2009 to simplify the design and conduct of clinical trials intended to support marketing applications. The writing committee recognizes that these definitions may be used in other types of clinical trials and clinical care processes where appropriate. Use of these definitions at the FDA has enhanced the ability to aggregate data within and across medical product development programs, conduct meta-analyses to evaluate cardiovascular safety, integrate data from multiple trials, and compare effectiveness of drugs and devices. Further study is needed to determine whether prospective data collection using these common definitions improves the design, conduct, and interpretability of the results of clinical trials. Published jointly by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available