4.7 Review

Antithrombotic Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 21, Pages 2450-2467

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.483

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Abbott
  6. Amarin
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Chiesi
  9. Eisai
  10. Ethicon
  11. Forest Laboratories
  12. Ironwood
  13. Ischemix
  14. Lilly
  15. Medtronic
  16. Pfizer
  17. Roche
  18. Sanofi
  19. Medicines Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects over 200 million people globally and is a cause of significant morbidity, mortality, and disability due to limb loss. Although secondary prevention with antithrombotic therapy is a mainstay of treatment to prevent adverse cardiovascular events, PAD patients are often undertreated with antithrombotic agents. Furthermore, there is a paucity of high-quality data from randomized controlled trials of PAD patients, leading to wide variations in clinical practice and guideline recommendations. Recently, there have been important advances that have further increased the number of antiplatelet and anticoagulant choices potentially available for patients with PAD. In this context, this paper aims to summarize the current available evidence for the safety and efficacy of various antithrombotic agents in PAD, and discuss how to integrate this emerging evidence into actual clinical practice. An evidenced-based approach to PAD patients is essential to achieve optimal outcomes, weighing cardiovascular and limb benefits against bleeding risks. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available