4.8 Article

Machine Learning Directed Search for Ultraincompressible, Superhard Materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 140, Issue 31, Pages 9844-9853

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b02717

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-CMMI 15-62142, NSF-CMMI 15-62226, EAR-1344579, EAR-1654687]
  2. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [55625-DNI10]
  3. Seed Funding for Advanced Computing (SeFAC) at the University of Houston
  4. HCC-REEMS REU program [DMR-1460564]
  5. Eby Nell McElrath Postdoctoral Fellowship at University of Houston
  6. Carnegie DOE Alliance Center (CDAC)
  7. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. COMPRES, the Consortium for Materials Properties Research in Earth Sciences under NSF [EAR-160685]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the pursuit of materials with exceptional mechanical properties, a machine-learning model is developed to direct the synthetic efforts toward compounds with high hardness by predicting the elastic moduli as a proxy. This approach screens 118 287 compounds compiled in crystal structure databases for the materials with the highest bulk and shear moduli determined by support vector machine regression. Following these models, a ternary rhenium tungsten carbide and a quaternary molybdenum tungsten borocarbide are selected and synthesized at ambient pressure. High-pressure diamond anvil cell measurements corroborate the machine-learning prediction of the bulk modulus with less than 10% error, as well as confirm the ultraincompressible nature of both compounds. Subsequent Vickers microhardness measurements reveal that each compound also has an extremely high hardness exceeding the superhard threshold of 40 GPa at low loads (0.49 N). These results show the effectiveness of materials development through state-of-the-art machine-learning techniques by identifying functional inorganic materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available