4.8 Article

Control of Electronic Structure and Conductivity in Two-Dimensional Metal Semiquinoid Frameworks of Titanium, Vanadium, and Chromium

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 140, Issue 8, Pages 3040-3051

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b13510

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1611525]
  2. Nanoporous Materials Genome Center of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-FG02-17ER16362]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. NSF
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1611525] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The isostructural, two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks (H2NMe2)(2)M-2(Cl(2)dhbq)(3) (M = Ti, V; Cl(2)dhbq(n-) = deprotonated 2,5-dichloro-3,6-dihydroxybenzoquinone) and (H2NMe2)(1.5)Cr-2(dhbq)(3) (dhbq(n-) = deprotonated 2,5-dihydroxybenzoquinone) are synthesized and investigated by spectroscopic, magnetic, and electrochemical methods. The three frameworks exhibit substantial differences in their electronic structures, and the bulk electronic conductivities of these phases correlate with the extent of delocalization observed via UV-vis-NIR and IR spectroscopies. Notably, substantial metal-ligand covalency in the vanadium phase results in the quenching of ligand-based spins, the observation of simultaneous metal- and ligand-based redox processes, and a high electronic conductivity of 0.45 S/cm. A molecular orbital analysis of these materials and a previously reported iron congener suggests that the differences in conductivity can be explained by correlating the metal-ligand energy alignment with the energy of intervalence charge-transfer transitions, which should determine the barrier to charge hopping in the mixed-valence frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available