4.7 Article

Phase formation and microwave dielectric properties of BiMVO5 (M = Ca, Mg) ceramics potential for low temperature co-fired ceramics application

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 362-371

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.15943

Keywords

BiMVO5; ceramics; low temperature co-fired ceramics; microwave dielectric properties

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51502047, 21561008, 21761008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2015GXNSFFA139003, 2016GXNSFBA380134, 2016GXNSFAA380018]
  3. Project of Scientific Research and Technical Exploitation Program of Guilin [2016010702-2, 20170225]
  4. State Scholarship fund of the China Scholarship Council [CSC201708420285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two low-firing BiMVO5 (M = Ca, Mg) ceramics were prepared in the sintering temperature range of 760-850 degrees C. Their differences in phase formation, sintering behavior, and dielectric performances were investigated. BiCaVO5 formed a single phase with an orthorhombic structure, while BiMgVO5 crystallized in a monoclinic structure that needs longer dwelling time to obtain single phase. The optimized microwave dielectric properties were obtained with epsilon(r) = 15.70, Q x f = 55 000 GHz (at 10.6 GHz), and tau(f) = -71 ppm/degrees C for BiCaVO5, epsilon(r) = 18.55, Q x f = 86 860 GHz (at 9.63 GHz), and tau(f) = -65 ppm/degrees C for BiMgVO5. In addition, the large negative tf values of BiMVO5 (M = Ca, Mg) ceramics were successfully adjusted by forming composite ceramics with CaTiO3 and near-zero tau(f) values of +2 ppm/degrees C and -3 ppm/degrees C were obtained in 0.92BiCaVO(5)-0.08CaTiO3 and 0.94BiMgVO(5)-0.06CaTiO(3), respectively. Both ceramics exhibited good chemical compatibility with Ag electrode. The results demonstrate BiMVO5 (M = Ca, Mg) ceramics to be attractive candidates in LTCC technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available