4.7 Article

A multiscale methodology quantifying the sintering temperature-dependent mechanical properties of oxide matrix composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages 3168-3180

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.15473

Keywords

ceramic matrix composites; finite element analysis; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201306110007]
  2. National University of Defense Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel methodology combining multiscale mechanical testing and finite element modeling is proposed to quantify the sintering temperature-dependent mechanical properties of oxide matrix composites, like aluminosilicate (AS) fiber reinforced Al2O3 matrix (AS(f)/Al2O3) composite in this work. The results showed a high-temperature sensitivity in the modulus/strength of AS fiber and Al2O3 matrix due to their phase transitions at 1200 degrees C, as revealed by instrumented nanoindentation technique. The interfacial strength, as measured by a novel fiber push-in technique, was also temperature-dependent. Specially at 1200 degrees C, an interfacial phase reaction was observed, which bonded the interface tightly, as a result, the interfacial shear strength was up to approximate to 450MPa. Employing the measured micro-mechanical parameters of the composite constituents enabled the prediction of deformation mechanism of the composite in microscale, which suggested a dominant role of interface on the ductile/brittle behavior of the composite in tension and shear. Accordingly, the AS(f)/Al2O3 composite exhibited a ductile-to-brittle transition as the sintering temperature increased from 800 to 1200 degrees C, due to the prohibition of interfacial debonding at higher temperatures, in good agreement with numerical predictions. The proposed multiscale methodology provides a powerful tool to study the mechanical properties of oxide matrix composites qualitatively and quantitatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available