4.7 Article

Nanostructured mullite steam oxidation resistant coatings for silicon carbide deposited via atomic layer deposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages 2493-2505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.15408

Keywords

density functional theory; diffusion; diffusivity; environmental barrier coatings; oxidation resistance; silicon carbide

Funding

  1. DOE EERE [DE-EE0006671]
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-0821794]
  3. University of Colorado Boulder
  4. ALD NanoSolutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidation resistant, thin, pinhole-free, crystalline mullite coatings were deposited on zirconia and silicon carbide particles using atomic layer deposition (ALD). The composition of the films was confirmed with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP OES), and the conformality and elemental dispersion of the films were characterized with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), respectively. The films are deposited on the particle surface with a deposition rate of similar to 1 angstrom/cycle. The elemental concentration of aluminum relative to silicon in the film was determined to be 2.68:1 which agrees closely with the ratio of stable 3:2 mullite (2.88:1). A high-temperature anneal for 5 hours at 1500 degrees C was used to crystallize the films into the mullite phase. This work represents the first deposition of mullite films by ALD. The mullite and alumina-coated particles were exposed to high-temperature steam for 20 hours at 1000 degrees C to assess the oxidation resistance of the films, which reduced the oxidation of silicon carbide by up to 62% relative to uncoated particles under these conditions. The activation energy of oxygen diffusion in the films was determined with density functional theory, and the computational results aligned well with the experimental outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available