4.6 Article

Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk for Merkel cell carcinoma and malignant adnexal skin tumors: A nationwide case-control study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 460-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.014

Keywords

antihypertensives; epidemiology; hydrochlorothiazide; malignant adnexal skin tumors; Merkel cell carcinoma; pharmacology; skin cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society [R72-A4417]
  2. Danish Council of Independent Research [4004-00234B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hydrochlorothiazide use has been associated with markedly increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma. No previous studies have investigated the association between hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and malignant adnexal skin tumors (MAST). Objective: To examine the association between hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk for MCC and MAST. Methods: Using Danish nationwide health registries, we identified all patients with incident MCC or MAST during 2004-2015 and matched the cases individually to cancer-free population controls by risk set sampling. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) associated with cumulative use of hydrochlorothiazide. Results: The adjusted ORs for MCC and MAST associated with high use (>= 50,000 mg) of hydrochlorothiazide was 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-4.8) and 3.6 (95% CI 1.9-7.0), respectively, which increased to 3.3 (95% CI 1.3-8.3) and 5.6 (95% CI 2.4-13.3), respectively, with highest use (>= 100,000 mg). We found no increased risk for these tumors in analyses of drugs with similar indications as hydrochlorothiazide, except there was a tendency toward an increased risk for MCC associated with the use of furosemide (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.0). Limitations: No data on sun exposure was available. Conclusion: Hydrochlorothiazide use is associated with an increased risk for MCC and MAST.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available