4.6 Article

Characterization of disease burden, comorbidities, and treatment use in a large, US-based cohort: Results from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 323-332

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.012

Keywords

biologic therapy; effectiveness; psoriasis; real-world; registry; safety; systemic therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Corrona LLC
  2. AbbVie
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Celgene
  5. Valeant
  6. Merck
  7. Eli Lilly and Company
  8. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation
  9. Amgen
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Crescendo
  13. Genentech
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Horizon Pharma USA
  16. Janssen
  17. Momenta Pharmaceuticals
  18. Novartis
  19. Pfizer
  20. Roche
  21. UCB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Psoriasis is an immunodysregulatory inflammatory disease associated with comorbidities affecting quality of life. With the advent of new treatments, there is growing need to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of treatments in a real-world setting. Objective: The objective of the Corrona Psoriasis Registry is to study the comparative safety and efficacy of Food and Drug Administration-approved biologic treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients enrolled in the registry, who initiated or switched to a systemic therapy at enrollment or previous 12 months. Descriptive characteristics (demographics, clinical and patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities, and treatment history) were examined at registry enrollment. Results: As of October 1, 2016, there were 1942 patients enrolled in the registry: 23% on apremilast, 4% on other nonbiologic systemic medications, 25% on interleukin (IL) 17A inhibitors, 22% on an IL-12/23 inhibitor, and 26% on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Overall, mean disease duration was 15.6 years, and 40% had a concurrent psoriatic arthritis diagnosis. About 66% had >3% body surface area involvement and 49% had a moderate or severe Investigator Global Assessment. Limitations: Selection and channeling bias can result in potential confounding that needs to be addressed in modeled analyses. Conclusion: This disease-based registry cohort represents a population exposed to multiple therapies, long disease duration, and multiple comorbidities and can be used to examine comparative safety and efficacy of various therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available