4.5 Article

Subcritical water extraction of antioxidants from mountain germander (Teucrium montanum L.)

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 200-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2018.04.019

Keywords

Teucrium montanwn; Subcritical water extraction; Antioxidant activity; Phenolic compounds; HPLC-PDA

Funding

  1. Portugal (FCT) [6818]
  2. Serbia (MSTD) [6818]
  3. Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development [TR 31014]
  4. Qualidade e Seguranca Alimentar-uma abordagem (nano) tecnologica [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000011-311]
  5. FCT/MEC
  6. FEDER [UM/QUI/50006/2013-P0C1/01/0145/FEDER/007265]
  7. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/78845/2011, SFRH/BPD/97049/2013]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/78845/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, antioxidant compounds from Teucrium montanwn were extracted by subcritical water. The influence of extraction temperature and pressure on antioxidant activity of extracts has been investigated in terms of extraction yield (EY), total phenolic content (TPC), and DPPH-radical scavenging activity (DPPH-RSA) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP). Additionally, the compounds responsible for the antioxidant activity were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest EY (42.63%), TPC (174.61 +/- 4.09 mg GAE/g DE) and antioxidant activity by DPPH-RSA (176.23 +/- 8.76 mg TE/g DE) and FRAP (141.71 +/- 5.21 mg AAE/g DE) were seen in extracts obtained at temperature of 160 degrees C and pressure of 10 bar. HPLC analysis revealed that naringin and gallic acid were the principle antioxidant compounds in subcritical extracts. According to the results, SWE has a great potential in exploitation of natural sources of bioactive compounds and production of pharmacologically-active fractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available