4.3 Article

Magnesium hexakis(methanol)-dinitrate complex electrolyte for use in rechargeable magnesium batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 2671-2679

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-018-3986-z

Keywords

Energy storage; Magnesium battery; Electrolyte; Cathode

Funding

  1. Support Development of Scientific Research Centre of Benha University (SDSRC) [1076]
  2. Science Technology Development Fund [12564]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional compatible electrolyte with Mg2+ intercalation cathodes represents one of the largest obstacles in the development of practical Mg batteries MBs. In current work, we report for the first time magnesium hexakis(methanol)-dinitrate complex (MHMD) electrolyte product reaction of 2,2-dimethoxypropane with magnesium nitrate hexahydrate via 'Solvent-in-Salt' method. 2,2-Dimethoxypropane as a water scavenger can capture reducible molecules like H2O and dehydrate Mg(NO3)(2).6H(2)O to form magnesium hexakis(methanol)-dinitrate complex. Meanwhile, Mg cloud bonds will become weak-something which frees up the mobility of Mg2+. This electrolyte exhibits high ionic conductivity with low activation energy similar to 0.18 eV. The general aim of the investigation was to demonstrate a potential application of MHMD electrolyte in Mg-ion cell. Mg cells were analyzed with the use of cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charging/discharging tests, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. A comparative study between different cathodes like V2O5, GeO2, TiO2, and S using MHMD electrolyte was performed. The S cathode has an initial discharge capacity of 370 mAh g(-1) and retained a reversible capacity at 60 mAh g(-1) after 20 cycles exhibiting better electrochemical performances than those of V2O5, GeO2, and TiO2 cathodes. This work opens up a new pathway to explore new electrolytic materials for MBs with high performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available