4.3 Article

Hirsutism and oligomenorrhea are appropriate screening criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents

Journal

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 625-629

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1025380

Keywords

Adolescence; androgens; biochemical hyperandrogenism; polycystic ovarian morphology; polycystic ovary syndrome

Funding

  1. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT) [1100123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the association of hirsutism and oligomenorrhea (persistent menstrual cycles > 45 days) as screening criteria for the detection of biochemical hyperandrogenism (BH) and polycystic ovaries (PCOM) during adolescence and determined which androgens, granulosa cell hormone, ultrasonographic parameters have the best association with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hirsute girls with oligomenorrhea (N = 26 Hirs/Oligo group) and non-hirsute girls with regular cycles (N = 63, C group) were studied. Prevalence of BH and PCOM, diagnostic performance of androgens and ultrasound parameters for PCOS diagnosis were analyzed. BH and PCOM prevalence were higher in the Hirs/Oligo girls than in the C girls (76.9% versus 25.5%; 92.3% versus 33.3%, respectively; p<0.0001). A complete PCOS phenotype (Hirs/Oligo with BH and PCOM) was observed in 73.1% of the Hirs/Oligo group. The presence of both BH and PCOM was observed in 7.9% of the C group. The parameters with the best diagnostic performance were free androgen index >= 6.1, testosterone >= 2.4 nmol/L, follicle number >= 12 and ovarian volume >= 10 ml anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) exhibited a low diagnostic accuracy. Hirsutism and persistent menstrual cycle over 45 days are highly associated with BH and PCOM suggesting that the presences of both criteria are necessary for the diagnosis of PCOS during adolescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available