4.2 Article

Non-suckling starvation of neonatal mice promotes primordial follicle formation with activation of ovarian autophagy

Journal

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 89-94

Publisher

SOCIETY REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT-SRD
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2017-126

Keywords

Autophagy; Mice; Neonatal; Primordial follicles; Starvation

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17J02206]
  2. MEXT Program
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17J02206] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Around the time of oocyte meiotic arrest, germ cell nest breakdown occurs, and primordial follicle (PF) formation is initiated at the perinatal stage. Recently, autophagy was implicated in this process. Autophagy is induced by nutrient starvation. This study was conducted to understand how starvation affects PF formation and autophagy induction during neonatal life. Suckling of neonatal female mice was blocked immediately after birth for 12-36 h to induce starvation. The numbers of PFs at each stage were subsequently counted from serial sections of ovaries. The expression of autophagy-related proteins was also evaluated. The number of PFs peaked at 60 h after birth in the control group. The numbers for the starvation groups were significantly higher than those for the control groups at 12 and 36 h. LC3B was clearly present in the oocyte cytoplasm. At 36 h after birth, the starvation group showed a higher rate of LC3II/LC3-I expression as a marker for autophagy. Moreover, the expression of p62 as a selective substrate for autophagy decreased compared to the control group. The expression of caspase-9 as a marker for apoptosis tended to be lower at 36 h in the starvation groups. These results indicate that starvation promotes PF formation with a concomitant activation of autophagy in early neonatal ovaries, suggesting that autophagy induction during follicle assembly might increase the number of PFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available