4.3 Article

Estimation of the effects of medical diagnostic radiation exposure based on DNA damage

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry006

Keywords

CT scan; medical radiation; DNA damage; chromosome aberration; biological dosimetry

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP16H01312, JP15H02821, JP26430114]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Center of World Intelligence Project for Nuclear S&T and Human Resource Development by MEXT
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA CRP E3.50.08]
  6. Program of the Network-type Joint Usage/Research Center for Radiation Disaster Medical Science of Hiroshima University
  7. Program of the Network-type Joint Usage/Research Center for Radiation Disaster Medical Science of Nagasaki University
  8. Program of the Network-type Joint Usage/Research Center for Radiation Disaster Medical Science of Fukushima Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-rays are widely applied in the medical field for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Among the uses of X-rays in diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) has been established as one of the most informative diagnostic radiology examinations. Moreover, recent advances in CT scan technology have made this examination much easier and more informative and increased its application, especially in Japan. However, the radiation dose of CT scans is higher than that of simple X-ray examinations. Therefore, the health risk of a CT scan has been discussed in various studies, but is still controversial. Consequently, the biological and cytogenetic effects of CT scans are being analyzed. Here, we summarize the recent findings concerning the biological and cytogenetic effects of ionizing radiation from a CT scan, by focusing on DNA damage and chromosome aberrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available