4.6 Article

Staphylococcus-Related Glomerulonephritis and Poststreptococcal Glomerulonephritis: Why Defining Post Is Important in Understanding and Treating Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 826-832

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.023

Keywords

Post-staphylococcal glomerulonephritis; post-infectious glomerulonephritis; latent period; kidney biopsy; renal disease; nosology; nomenclature; medical error; steroid treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A spate of recent publications describes a newly recognized form of glomerulonephritis associated with active staphylococcal infection. The key kidney biopsy findings, glomerular immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposits dominant or codominant with IgG deposits, resemble those of IgA nephritis. Many authors describe this condition as postinfectious and have termed it poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis. However, viewed through the prism of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, the prefix post in post-staphylococcal glomerulonephritis is historically incorrect, illogical, and misleading with regard to choosing therapy. There are numerous reports describing the use of high-dose steroids to treat poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis. The decision to use steroid therapy suggests that the treating physician believed that the dominant problem was a post-infectious glomerulonephritis, not the infection itself. Unfortunately, steroid therapy in staphylococcus-related glomerulonephritis can precipitate severe staphylococcal sepsis and even death and provides no observable benefits. Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis is an authentic postinfectious glomerulonephritis; poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis is not. Making this distinction is important from the perspective of history, pathogenesis, and clinical management. (C) 2015 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available