4.8 Article

Graphene-like porous carbon nanosheets derived from salvia splendens for high-rate performance supercapacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 397, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.100

Keywords

Graphene-like carbon nanosheets; Salt sealing; High rate; Supercapacitor; Biomass

Funding

  1. Program for NSFC [51674219]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610502]
  3. Foundation of Hunan Educational Committee [17C1522]
  4. Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene-like porous carbon nanosheets (GPCNs) have recently been viewed as the outstanding electrode materials for high-rate-performance supercapacitors because the 2D nanosheets can integrate high conductivity and high aspect ratio together to promote both ion transport and electron transfer. The fabrication of GPCNs from sheet-like plant raw materials is of great importance to lowering production cost and simultaneously to promoting environment protection. Herein, we demonstrate the utilization of salt sealing strategy to fabricate GPCNs with flower petals as the precursor. The petals of salvia splendens are firstly crushed and sealed in NaCl crystal. After pyrolysis at the optimal temperature, salvia splendens-derived, O/N-codoped GPCNs are obtained by washing off NaCl with water. The resulting GPCNs possess a relatively high specific surface area and a moderate O, N contents. Owing to these characteristics, the GPCNs-based supercapacitor exhibits high rate capability (88.6% and 83.4% capacity retention from 1 to 100 A g(-1) in 6 M KOH and 1 M Na2SO4 solutions, respectively) and excellent stability. Taking into account the species diversity, renewability, and abundance of plant raw materials, they can serve as a novel kind of precursors for the fabrication of heteroatom-doped GPCNs for high-rate-performance supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available