4.8 Article

Internal resistance mapping preparation to optimize electrode thickness and density using symmetric cell for high-performance lithium-ion batteries and capacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 396, Issue -, Pages 207-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.083

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; Internal resistance; Composite electrode; Symmetric cell; Electrode density

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP25249140, JP17K05962, JP16K17970, JP17K14920]
  2. Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (A-STEP) [AS282S002d]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods for characterizing and optimizing the internal resistance of electrodes are crucial for achieving the simultaneous goals of high energy density and high power density in lithium-ion batteries. In this study we proposeand confirm the efficacy ofa method for electrode design optimization based on the construction of an internal resistance map, a visualization tool for minimizing electrode resistance. The construction of the map proceeds by identifying the three primary components of the electrode resistancecharge-transfer resistance, ionic resistance, and contact resistanceand elucidating the dependence of each component on electrode density and thickness. We fabricate electrode sheets of various densities and thicknesses and conduct electrode impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements to measure the dependence of internal resistance on density and thickness, which we characterize via empirical formulas incorporated into our internal resistance map. Using our map, we predict that the resistance per unit area of a nickel-cobalt- manganese (NCM) electrode attains its minimum value at thickness 70 mu m and density 2.9 g cm(-3). We then further use the map to predict variations in IR drop for NCM electrodes of different densities, obtaining results in excellent agreement with experimental measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available