4.8 Review

Recent progress of advanced binders for Li-S batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 396, Issue -, Pages 19-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.096

Keywords

Binder; Sulfur; Cathode; Li-S battery; High loading

Funding

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program of the Center for Hybrid Interface Materials (HIM) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2013M3A6B1078875]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST) [NRF-2018R1A2B3008794]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered as one of the most promising energy storage systems. However, the commercial application of Li-S batteries with practical loading levels ( > 7 mg cm(-2)) still remains several obstacles, including low sulfur utilization, short lifespan, and poor rate property. Exploiting advanced multifunctional binders is an effective and straightforward approach to improve electrochemical performance and this method has the inherent advantage of not introducing additional weight and volume, which will undermine maximizing the cell energy density. Traditional PVDF binder fails to withstand mechanical instability of high loading electrode; moreover, the binder possesses poor affinity for polysulfides, making it unsuitable for high loading Li-S battery. Hence, designing rationally advanced binder systems is urgently required to fabricate high loading sulfur electrodes. Although much effort has been devoted in this regard, practical binders for high loading sulfur electrodes are still absent. To accelerate the development of such binder systems, we review the recent progress on the advanced binders in high-performance Li-S batteries. We discuss their functional mechanisms, summarize their desirable properties, and then provide perspective on the future development of advanced binders for practical Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available