4.6 Review

Historical Landscape Perspectives on Grasslands in Sweden and the Baltic Region

Journal

LAND
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 300-321

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land3010300

Keywords

conservation baselines; extinction debt; historical ecology; remnant populations; semi-natural grasslands

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council Formas
  3. EU
  4. MISTRA
  5. Strategic Research Program Ekoklim at Stockholm University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A landscape perspective is generally recognized as essential for conservation biology. The main underlying reason is that species respond to features of the landscape at various spatial scales, for example habitat area, connectivity, and matrix habitats. However, there is also an historical component of a landscape perspective, which has not received similar attention. The underlying reasons for historical effects are that humans have influenced landscapes during several millennia and that species and communities may respond slowly to land use change. An historical perspective on landscapes also relates to how we perceive natural vs. cultural landscapes, and thus how conservation actions are motivated and valuated. We review studies from Sweden and the Baltic region in the context of an historical landscape perspective, focusing on semi-natural grasslands, i.e., grasslands formed by long-term human management for grazing and hay-making. Semi-natural grasslands are today a high concern for conservation. Historical effects are ubiquitous on species distributions and patterns of species richness, and have important implications for developing informed conservation programs in semi-natural grasslands, particularly with regard to assumptions of historical baselines, the choice of conservation targets, and insights on time-lags in the response of species to current landscape change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available