4.6 Article

Sex differences in diaphragmatic fatigue: the cardiovascular response to inspiratory resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 596, Issue 17, Pages 4017-4032

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP275794

Keywords

cervical magnetic stimulation; diaphragm; inspiratory muscle fatigue; metaboreflex; phrenic nerve; sex-differences

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diaphragmatic fatigue (DF) elicits reflexive increases in sympathetic vasomotor outflow (i.e. metaboreflex). There is some evidence suggesting women may be more resistant to DF compared to men, and therefore may experience an attenuated inspiratory muscle metaboreflex. To this end, we sought to examine the cardiovascular response to inspiratory resistance in healthy young men (n = 9, age = 24 +/- 3 years) and women (n = 9, age = 243 years). Subjects performed isocapnic inspiratory pressure-threshold loading (PTL, 60% maximal inspiratory mouth pressure) to task failure. Diaphragmatic fatigue was assessed by measuring transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (P-di,P-tw) using cervical magnetic stimulation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured beat-by-beat throughout PTL via photo-plethysmography, and low-frequency systolic pressure (LFSBP; a surrogate for sympathetic vasomotor tone) calculated from arterial waveforms using power spectrum analysis. At PTL task failure, the degree of DF was similar between sexes (similar to 23% reduction in P-di,P-tw; P = 0.33). However, time to task failure was significantly longer in women than in men (2711 vs. 1611 min, respectively; P = 0.02). Women exhibited less of an increase in HR (13 +/- 8 vs. 19 +/- 12 bpm; P = 0.02) and MAP (10 +/- 8 vs. 14 +/- 9 mmHg; P = 0.01), and significantly lower LFSBP (23 +/- 11 vs. 34 +/- 8 mmHg(2); P = 0.04) during PTL compared to men. An attenuation of the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex may influence limb and respiratory muscle haemodynamics with implications for exercise performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available