4.5 Review

Tissue remodelling in chronic bronchial diseases: from the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
Volume 23, Issue 131, Pages 118-130

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00004413

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institut Thematique Multi Organisme ImmunoHemato-Pneumologie of the French National Alliance for Life Sciences and Health (Paris,France)
  2. Vaincre la Mucoviscidose (Paris)
  3. Agence de Biomedecine (Paris)
  4. INSERM (Paris)
  5. Region Pays de La Loire (Nantes,France)
  6. Institut de Recherche en Sante Respiratoire des Pays de la Loire (Nantes
  7. Fondation du souffle (Paris)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Airway remodelling is a critical feature of chronic bronchial diseases, characterised by aberrant repair of the epithelium and accumulation of fibroblasts, which contribute to extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition resulting in fixed bronchial obstruction. Recently, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been identified as a new source of fibroblasts that could contribute to the remodelling of the airways. This phenomenon consists of the loss of the epithelial phenotype by bronchial epithelial cells and the acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype. These cells are then able to migrate and secrete ECM molecules. Herein, we review the different types of EMT. We will then focus on the signalling pathways that are involved, such as transforming growth factor-beta and Wnt, as well as the more recently described Sonic Hedgehog pathway. Finally, we will highlight the implication of EMT in airway remodelling in specific chronic bronchial pathologies, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiolitis obliterans following lung transplantation. Despite the limitations of in vitro models, future studies of EMT in vivo are warranted to shed new light on the pathomechanisms of bronchial obstruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available