4.4 Article

The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 119-137

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2167702613497473

Keywords

psychiatric epidemiology; developmental psychopathology; DSM

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [G032282]
  2. Medical Research Council [MRK00381X]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD061298]
  4. Jacobs Foundation
  5. NIA [T32 AG000029]
  6. NICHD [T32 HD07376]
  7. Yad Hanadiv Rothschild Foundation
  8. National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30 DA023026]
  9. New Zealand Health Research Council
  10. MRC [MR/K00381X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mental disorders traditionally have been viewed as distinct, episodic, and categorical conditions. This view has been challenged by evidence that many disorders are sequentially comorbid, recurrent/chronic, and exist on a continuum. Using the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, we examined the structure of psychopathology, taking into account dimensionality, persistence, co-occurrence, and sequential comorbidity of mental disorders across 20 years, from adolescence to midlife. Psychiatric disorders were initially explained by three higher-order factors (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Thought Disorder) but explained even better with one General Psychopathology dimension. We have called this dimension the p factor because it conceptually parallels a familiar dimension in psychological science: the g factor of general intelligence. Higher p scores are associated with more life impairment, greater familiality, worse developmental histories, and more compromised early-life brain function. The p factor explains why it is challenging to find causes, consequences, biomarkers, and treatments with specificity to individual mental disorders. Transdiagnostic approaches may improve research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available