4.7 Article

In situ DRIFTS study of the mechanism of low temperature selective catalytic reduction over manganese-iron oxides

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 294-301

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60730-X

Keywords

Nitrogen Oxide; Ammonia; Manganese-iron catalysts; Low temperature selective catalytic reduction; In situ diffuse reflectance infrared; Fourier transform spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51176118, 51306115]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520894, 2013T60445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the mechanism of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3, Ti0.9Mn0.05Fe0.05O2-delta catalyst was prepared by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) method and evaluated at 25-450 degrees C. The catalyst was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The possible SCR mechanism over Ti0.9Mn0.05Fe0.05O2-delta was studied by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS). Ti0.9Mn0.05Fe0.05O2-delta showed both high SCR activity and N-2 selectivity over a broad temperature window of 100-350 degrees C. The XRD and TEM results indicated that the active components of Mn and Fe were in a highly dispersed state and in an amorphous form on TiO2. The DRIFTS results revealed that Bronsted acid sites were the active centers for NO removal and monodentate nitrates were the key intermediate in the SCR reaction. At 150 C, both Langmuir-Hinshelwood and Eley-Rideal mechanisms are involved in the SCR reaction, while the former one mechanism dominates the catalytic activity of Ti0.9Mn0.05Fe0.05O2-delta. Additionally, the presence of O-2 significantly affects NO oxidation and coordinated NH3 activation. (c) 2014, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available