4.8 Article

Agonists of G-Protein-Coupled Odorant Receptors Are Predicted from Chemical Features

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages 2235-2240

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00633

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institute of Health [DC014423, DC012095]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1515801]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche as part of NSF/NIH/ANR Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience
  4. UCA IDEX grant
  5. GIRACT
  6. GEN foundation
  7. Fondation Roudnitska under the aegis of Fondation de France
  8. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [S10OD018164] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predicting the activity of chemicals for a given odorant receptor is a longstanding challenge. Here the activity of 258 chemicals on the human G-protein-coupled odorant receptor (OR)51E1, also known as prostate-specific G-protein-coupled receptor 2 (PSGR2), was virtually screened by machine learning using 4884 chemical descriptors as input. A systematic control by functional in vitro assays revealed that a support vector machine algorithm accurately predicted the activity of a screened library. It allowed us to identify two novel agonists in vitro for OR51E1. The transferability of the protocol was assessed on OR1A1, OR2W1, and MOR256-3 odorant receptors, and, in each case, novel agonists were identified with a hit rate of 39-50%. We further show how ligands' efficacy is encoded into residues within OR51E1 cavity using a molecular modeling protocol. Our approach allows widening the chemical spaces associated with odorant receptors. This machine-learning protocol based on chemical features thus represents an efficient tool for screening ligands for G-protein-coupled odorant receptors that modulate non-olfactory functions or, upon combinatorial activation, give rise to our sense of smell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available