4.6 Article

Effect of LiFSI Concentrations To Form Thickness- and Modulus-Controlled SEI Layers on Lithium Metal Anodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 122, Issue 18, Pages 9825-9834

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02314

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ17E020004, LQ18E020004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51650110490]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601985]
  4. National Key Research and Development program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2016YFB0100106]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09010403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving the cyclic stability of lithium metal anodes is of particular importance for developing high-energy-density batteries. In this work, a remarkable finding shows that the control of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) concentrations in electrolytes significantly alters the thickness and modulus of the related SEI layers, leading to varied cycling performances of Li metal anodes. In an electrolyte containing 2 M LiFSI, an SEI layer of similar to 70 nm that is obviously thicker than those obtained in other concentrations is observed through in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM). In addition to the decomposition of FSI- anions that generates rigid lithium fluoride (LiF) as an SEI component, the modulus of this thick SEI layer with a high LiF content could be significantly strengthened to 10.7 GPa. Such a huge variation in SEI modulus, much higher than the threshold value of Li dendrite penetration, provides excellent performances of Li metal anodes with Coulombic efficiency higher than 99%. Our approach demonstrates that the FSI- anions with appropriate concentration can significantly alter the SEI quality, establishing a meaningful guideline for designing electrolyte formulation for stable lithium metal batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available