4.6 Article

Computational Study of Structural and Electronic Properties of Lead-Free CsMI3 Perovskites (M = Ge, Sn, Pb, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 122, Issue 14, Pages 7838-7848

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00226

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through the University of Minnesota MRSEC [DMR-1420013]
  2. National Science Foundation through the University of Minnesota MRSEC under iSuperseed program
  3. NSF through the UMN MRSEC program [DMR-1420013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electronic structure calculations of five crystallography-imitated structures of CsMI3 perovskites with M = Ge, Sn, Pb, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba were performed. The formation energy of different perovskite phases, their relative stability, and structural and electronic properties were explored. The sensitivity of the calculations to the choice of the density functional was investigated, and the predictions were compared with experimental results. The outcome of this study is that Mg and Ba perovskites are unlikely to form in the cubic, tetragonal, or orthorhombic phases because they have positive formation energies. Although Ca and Sr perovskites have negative formation energies with respect to the metal-iodide precursors, they exhibit wide band gaps and high hygroscopicity, making these unlikely candidates for applications in photovoltaic devices. Our results suggest that the performance of a local density functional with a nonseparable gradient approximation (NGA) is similar to that of hybrid functionals in terms of band gap predictions, when M in CsMI3 is a p-block element (Pb, Sn, and Ge). However, local density functionals with NGA predictions for the band gap are similar to other local functionals with a generalized gradient approximation (PBE, PBEsol, and PBE-D3) and are worse than those of HSE06, when M is an s-block element (Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available