4.7 Article

Evaluating terrestrial CO2 flux diagnoses and uncertainties from a simple land surface model and its residuals

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 217-235

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-217-2014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NOAA Office of Global Programs
  2. US Department of Energy Terrestrial Carbon Processes Program
  3. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-06ER64318]
  4. NASA [NAG5-7531]
  5. Office of Science (BER), US Department of Energy [FG0300ER63014, DE-FG02-07ER64371]
  6. Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. AmeriFlux (US Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program) [DE-FG02-04ER63917, DE-FG02-04ER63911]
  8. FluxNet-Canada (CFCAS)
  9. FluxNet-Canada (NSERC)
  10. FluxNet-Canada (BIOCAP)
  11. FluxNet-Canada (Environment Canada)
  12. FluxNet-Canada (NRCan)
  13. GreenGrass
  14. LBA
  15. NECC
  16. USCCC
  17. CarboEuropeIP
  18. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  19. iLEAPS
  20. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  21. National Science Foundation
  22. University of Tuscia
  23. Universite Laval and Environment Canada
  24. US Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global terrestrial atmosphere-ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes are well constrained by the concentration and isotopic composition of atmospheric carbon dioxide. In contrast, considerable uncertainty persists surrounding regional contributions to the net global flux as well as the impacts of atmospheric and biological processes that drive the net flux. These uncertainties severely limit our ability to make confident predictions of future terrestrial biological carbon fluxes. Here we use a simple light-use efficiency land surface model (the Vegetation Photosynthesis Respiration Model, VPRM) driven by remotely sensed temperature, moisture, and phenology to diagnose North American gross ecosystem exchange (GEE), ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) for the period 2001 to 2006. We optimize VPRM parameters to eddy covariance (EC) NEE observations from 65 North American FluxNet sites. We use a separate set of 27 cross-validation FluxNet sites to evaluate a range of spatial and temporal resolutions for parameter estimation. With these results we demonstrate that different spatial and temporal groupings of EC sites for parameter estimation achieve similar sum of squared residuals values through radically different spatial patterns of NEE. We also derive a regression model to estimate observed VPRM errors as a function of VPRM NEE, temperature, and precipitation. Because this estimate is based on model-observation residuals it is comprehensive of all the error sources present in modeled fluxes. We find that 1 km interannual variability in VPRM NEE is of similar magnitude to estimated 1 km VPRM NEE errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available