4.6 Article

Absorption-energy calculations of chlorophyll a and b with an explicit solvent model

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.003

Keywords

Photosynthesis; Light harvesting complex; I nhomogeneous broadening; Long-range correction; Ligand coordination; Site energy

Funding

  1. JST CREST [JPMJCR1656]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H00864, JP26105012, JP26800224, 16H06560]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Materials Integration for Engineering Polymers project of the Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP)
  5. Interdisciplinary Computational Science Program in CCS, University of Tsukuba
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26105012, 26800224, 16H06560] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The absorption energies of the Q(y) bands of chlorophylls a and b (Chla and Chlb) in organic solvents (acetone, diethyl ether, and ethanol) were calculated by combining molecular dynamics simulations and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approaches with an explicit solvent model. It was found that excitation-energy calculations by time-dependent density functional theory (DFT) using the CAM-B3LYP functional, following DFT geometry optimizations with the B3LYP functional, accurately reproduced the differences between the observed absorption energies of Chla/Chlb in each solvent. The calculated energies were within a root-mean-square deviation of 0.0014 eV from the observed values when the CAM-B3LYP-related parameter mu, which is associated with the long-range correlation, was set to 0.14. Calculations using mu = 0.14 also reproduced the observed transition-dipole strengths of the Q(y)-band moments, and the observed absorption spectra, with linewidths of similar to 0.05 eV. These results suggest that mu = 0.14 can be used for absorption-energy calculations for Chla and Chlb. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available