4.4 Article

Comparison of the sulfur-oxygenation of cysteine and S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine in human hepatic cytosol and the role of cysteine dioxygenase

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 8, Pages 1069-1077

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12944

Keywords

biopharmaceutics and drug disposition; drug disposition in tissues and whole animals; pharmacokinetics and drug disposition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo determine the K-m, V-max, cofactor, activator and inhibitor requirements of human cysteine dioxygenase and S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine S-oxygenase with respect to both l-Cysteine and S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine as substrates. MethodsIn vitro human hepatic cytosolic fraction enzyme assays were optimised for cysteine dioxygenase activity using l-Cysteine as substrate and the effect of various cofactors, activators and inhibitors on the S-oxidations of both l-Cysteine and S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine were investigated. Key findingsThe results of the invitro reaction phenotyping investigation found that although both cysteine dioxygenase and S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine S-oxygenase required Fe2+ for catalytic activity both enzymes showed considerable divergence in cofactor, activator and inhibitor specificities. Cysteine dioxygenase has no cofactor but uses NAD(+) and NADH(H+) as pharmacological chaperones and is not inhibited by S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine. S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine S-oxygenase requires tetrahydrobiopterin as a cofactor, is not activated by NAD(+) and NADH(H+) but is activated by l-Cysteine. Additionally, the sulfydryl alkylating agent, N-ethylmaleimide, activated carboxymethyl-l-cysteine S-oxygenase but inhibited cysteine dioxygenase. ConclusionsHuman hepatic cytosolic fraction cysteine dioxygenase activity is not responsible for the S-oxidation of the substituted cysteine, S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available