4.5 Article

Risk assessment of seismic hazards in hydraulic fracturing areas based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and AHP method (FAHP): A case analysis of Shangluo area in Yibin City, Sichuan Province, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 797-812

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.066

Keywords

AHP method; Fuzzy evaluation; Degree of membership; Hydraulic fracturing; Seismic risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC program) [41604050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model (FAHP) has been established to quantitatively evaluate the seismic risk of the region with covers 3080.25 km(2) including hydraulic fracturing operation areas. Taking into account the combined effect exerted by influencing factors such as geological structures, the seismic history and the stress accumulation, etc., six major factors are identified, namely, seismicity rates (Z value), magnitude-frequency coefficients (b value), salt mines, reservoirs, regional geotectonic (distribution of active faults), stress fields and the spatial distribution of fracturing platforms. In addition to using massive raw data as objective information, this model takes experts' assessments as the subjective judgment of expertise. According to the maximum membership principle, the most favorable risk evaluation have been made in 625 grids with optimized results through methods of the weighted average and the interpolation. Comprehensive evaluation maps have been drawn based on the seismic data from 2008 to 2016 used in modeling and have been validated by the seismic data in 2017. Results show that most of the seismic events in 2017 have fit into the high-risk area, especially those felt earthquakes larger than magnitude 3 have entirely fit into the medium-high risk area after the interpolation, indicating that the assessment results have certain objectivity and accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available