4.7 Review

Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey

Journal

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 147-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.002

Keywords

American Community Survey; Census tract; Small area estimation; Margin of error; Uncertainty

Categories

Funding

  1. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1132008] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1333271] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2010 the American Community Survey (ACS) replaced the long form of the United States decennial census. The ACS is now the principal source of high-resolution geographic information about the U.S. population. The margins of error on ACS census tract-level data are on average 75 percent larger than those of the corresponding 2000 long-form estimate. The practical implications of this increase is that data are sometimes so imprecise that they are difficult to use. This paper explains why the ACS tract and block group estimates have large margins of error. Statistical concepts are explained in plain English. ACS margins of error are attributed to specific methodological decisions made by the Census Bureau. These decisions are best seen as compromises that attempt to balance financial constraints against concerns about data quality, timeliness, and geographic precision. In addition, demographic and geographic patterns in ACS data quality are identified. These patterns are associated with demographic composition of census tracts. Understanding the fundamental causes of uncertainty in the survey suggests a number of geographic strategies for improving the usability and quality ACS. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available