4.6 Article

Laryngeal Mask Airway for Surfactant Administration in Neonates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 40-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.068

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Minnesota Medical Foundation
  2. Children's Hospital Association
  3. Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (University of Minnesota NCATS award) [UL1TR000114]
  4. Chiesi USA, Inc
  5. LMA North America
  6. Covidien
  7. CareFusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine if preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) who received surfactant via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) would have a decreased rate of intubation and mechanical ventilation compared with those on CPAP who did not receive surfactant. Study design In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 103 premature infants 28(0/7)-35(6/7) weeks gestation, >= 1250 g and <= 36 hours old on CPAP requiring fraction of inspired oxygen 0.30-0.40 were assigned to receive surfactant administered through an LMA then placed back on CPAP (LMA group) or maintained on CPAP with no surfactant administered (control group). The primary outcome was treatment failure necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of life. Results Surfactant administration through an LMA (n = 50) significantly decreased the rate of intubation and mechanical ventilation compared with controls (n = 53): 38% vs 64%, respectively, OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.13, 0.70), P = .006, number needed to treat: 4). There were no serious adverse events associated with placement of the LMA or surfactant administration. Conclusions In premature neonates with moderate respiratory distress syndrome, surfactant administered through an LMA decreased the rate of intubation and mechanical ventilation. This intervention may have significant impact on clinical care in both high and low resource settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available