4.4 Article

Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and infectious complications in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 449-451

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.005

Keywords

Pediatric surgery; Appendectomy; Antimicrobial prophylaxis; Infection prevention; Surgical site infection; Quality improvement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Antibiotic administration within one hour prior to incision is a common quality metric; however, antibiotics are typically started at the time of diagnosis in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis. The purpose was to determine if antibiotic administration within one hour prior to incision reduces the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis started on parenteral antibiotics upon diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 478 patients aged 0-18 years who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 7/2013 to 4/2015. Patients were categorized based on timing of antibiotic administration; there were 198 patients in Group A (<60 min before) and 280 in Group B (>60 min before). Results: Demographics and operative time (A: 30.5 +/- 9.9 vs B: 30.8 +/- 12.2 min, p = 0.51) were similar. Procedures were performed laparoscopically and the groups had similar proportions of single-incision operations (A: 53% vs B: 55%, p = 0.64). There was no difference in the incidence of superficial SSI (A: 2.0% vs B: 2.1%, p = 1.0) or intraabdominal abscess (A: 4.0% vs B: 3.6%, p = 0.81) and this remained true when stratified by intraoperative classification. Conclusion: Antibiotic administration within one hour of appendectomy in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis who receive antibiotics at diagnosis did not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available