4.0 Article

PSEUDO-INFECTED RED BLOOD CELL BEADS AS POSITIVE CONTROL FOR CELL MICROARRAY CHIP-BASED DETECTION OF PLASMODIUM-INFECTED RBCs

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages 283-288

Publisher

ALLEN PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1645/17-144

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17H04650]
  2. Sanyo Broadcasting Foundation
  3. Global Health Innovative Technology (GHIT) fund
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08452, 17H04650] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell microarray chip is a polystyrene plate with 20,944 microchambers, and it is used to detect red blood cells (RBCs) infected with the causative agent of malaria, Plasmodium. Plasmodium-infected red blood cells (iRBCs) stained with a nuclear staining dye (SYTO 21) form a monolayer on the bottom of the microchambers, and about 130 RBCs are accommodated in each such microchamber of the chip. The iRBCs in the RBC monolayer (containing 2.7 million RBCs) can be identified using a fluorescence detector, and the infection rate can be calculated by counting the number of fluorescent-positive RBCs. This diagnostic device is highly sensitive and hence advantageous for early diagnosis of malaria infections in endemic areas. However, a standard positive control for Plasmodium-infected RBCs is required to ensure that the reagents and detectors of these cell microarray chips are working efficiently in remote endemic areas. Here, we introduce pseudo-iRBC beads, which consist of a mixture of DEA beads mimicking RBCs and DEA beads coated with nucleic acids mimicking nuclei of the parasite. These beads can be stained with SYTO 21, applied onto the cell microarray chip to form a monolayer, and detected using the fluorescence detector in the same way as iRBCs. Therefore, the introduction of pseudo-iRBC beads as a positive control ensures unbiased malaria diagnoses with the cell microarray chip device in remote endemic areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available