4.3 Article

Clinical course of the bony lesion of single-system single-site Langerhans cell histiocytosis - Is appropriate follow-up sufficient treatment?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 168-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.08.018

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is categorized into three types, which include single-system single-site (SS-s), single-system multiple-site (SS-m) and multisystem (MS). The most commonly affected site in LCH is bone, and the bony lesion of SS-s LCH has a good prognosis. The bony lesion of SS-s LCH has been thought to regress spontaneously. Although treatments such as curettage, direct injection of corticosteroids, and chemotherapy have been performed, regular follow-up is the first line of treatment for the bony lesion of SS-s LCH. For preventing orthopedic sequelae, strict and appropriate follow-up should be performed, but the appropriate period and method of follow-up has not yet been established. Methods: In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed a series of 7 cases of patients with SS-s LCH with a bony lesion treated in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Kagoshima University Hospital (Kagoshima, Japan) from 2006 to 2015. Results: The bony lesion regressed spontaneously in all patients. Factors such as location, size, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) value, standardized uptake (SUV) value of positron emission tomography (PET), age, sex and direct steroid injection were not related to the clinical course. Temporary expansion of the lesion occurred in 3 patients and a temporary worsening of pain occurred in 1 patient during the follow-up period. These events occurred within 6 weeks after biopsy. Conclusion: Careful follow-up and the use of an appropriate orthosis can lead to a good clinical course for the bony lesion of SS-s LCH. Future research should seek to determine the appropriate follow-up period. (C) 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available