4.2 Article

Research Methodologies for Total Worker Health® Proceedings From a Workshop

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 968-978

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001404

Keywords

health; research methodologies; safety; Total Worker Health; well-being; worker

Funding

  1. CDC/NIOSH [U19OH008868, OH009762, U19 OH008857, U19 OH008861, U19 OH 011227, U19OH011232, U19 OH010154]
  2. CDC Workplace Health Research Network [3U48DP005008-01S2]
  3. CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard Evidence Review and Update [GS-00-F-0092P-200-2015-87943]
  4. ALLCDC
  5. NIOSH [3U19OH010154-02S2, 5U19OH011227-02] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  6. ALLCDC
  7. NIOSH [988845, 1073942, 575778, 5U19OH008857-13] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: There is growing interest in the NIOSH Total Worker Health((R)) program, specifically in the process of designing and implementing safer, health-promoting work and workplaces. A Total Worker Health (TWH) Research Methodology Workshop was convened to discuss research methods and future needs. Methods: Twenty-six experts in occupational safety and health and related fields reviewed and discussed current methodological and measurement issues and those showing promise. Results: TWH intervention studies face the same challenges as other workplace intervention studies and some unique ones. Examples are provided of different approaches and their applications to TWH intervention studies, and desired developments in the TWH literature. Conclusions: This report discusses and outlines principles important to building the TWH intervention research base. Rigorous, valid methodologic, and measurement approaches are needed for TWH intervention as well as for basic/etiologic, translational, and surveillance research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available