4.8 Article

Towards sustainable fuels and chemicals through the electrochemical reduction of CO2: lessons from water electrolysis

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 5114-5130

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5gc01893e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ETH Zurich [ETH-01 14-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The storage of renewable energy through the electrochemical reduction of CO2 (eCO(2)RR) is an attractive strategy to transform the current linear utilisation of carbon fuels (extraction-combustion-CO2 release) into an increasingly cyclic one. An electrochemical alternative for energy storage is the production of H-2 from water splitting, studied for decades and commercially available up to the megawatt range. By comparing the technological similarities between these two processes, it is possible to extract both a global perspective and research directions for the eCO(2)RR. Herein, the main limiting phenomena affecting CO2 electrolysers and their causes are outlined first. This is followed by the derivation, for several eCO(2)RR products, of targets in terms of durability, current efficiency, energy efficiency, faradaic efficiency, and overvoltage, which must be achieved for the eCO(2)RR to reach a similar energy storage capability as the electrochemical production of H-2. By comparing these figures of merit with the eCO(2)RR literature, we conclude that the conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide and formic acid lead the race towards practical use, although both still exhibit major performance gaps. The present energy efficiencies are low, mainly due to high overvoltages, and durability is not yet a developed research area. Besides the development of more efficient electrocatalysts, research advances on the fronts of electrode and electrolyser design, coupled with the optimisation of methods for the preparation of electrodes, are expected to push forward the electrochemical reduction of CO2 on its way to viability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available