4.3 Article

The persisting effect of maternal mood in pregnancy on childhood psychopathology

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 393-403

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414000029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15018] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH073842] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust [092731, 102215] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15018] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developmental or fetal programming has emerged as a major model for understanding the early and persisting effects of prenatal exposures on the health and development of the child and adult. We leverage the power of a 14-year prospective study to examine the persisting effects of prenatal anxiety, a key candidate in the developmental programming model, on symptoms of behavioral and emotional problems across five occasions of measurement from age 4 to 13 years. The study is based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort, a prospective, longitudinal study of a large community sample in the west of England (n = 7,944). Potential confounders included psychosocial and obstetric risk, postnatal maternal mood, paternal pre- and postnatal mood, and parenting. Results indicated that maternal prenatal anxiety predicted persistently higher behavioral and emotional symptoms across childhood with no diminishment of effect into adolescence. Elevated prenatal anxiety (top 15%) was associated with a twofold increase in risk of a probable child mental disorder, 12.31% compared with 6.83%, after allowing for confounders. Results were similar with prenatal depression. These analyses provide some of the strongest evidence to date that prenatal maternal mood has a direct and persisting effect on her child's psychiatric symptoms and support an in utero programming hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available