4.7 Article

Ventral Hippocampal Inputs Preferentially Drive Corticocortical Neurons in the Infralimbic Prefrontal Cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 33, Pages 7351-7363

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0378-18.2018

Keywords

circuit; hippocampus; interneuron; prefrontal cortex; projection neuron; synapse

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 MH085974]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH085974] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inputs from the ventral hippocampus (vHPC) to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) play a key role in working memory and emotional control. However, little is known about how excitatory inputs from the vHPC engage different populations of neurons in the PFC. Here we use optogenetics and whole-cell recordings to study the cell-type specificity of synaptic connections in acute slices from the mouse PFC. We first show that vHPC inputs target pyramidal neurons whose cell bodies are located in layer (L)2/3 and L5 of infralimbic (IL) PFC, but only in L5 of prelimbic (PL) PFC, and not L6 of either IL or PL. We then compare connections onto different classes of projection neurons located in these layers and subregions of PFC. We establish vHPC inputs similarly contact corticocortical (CC) and cortico-amygdala neurons in L2/3 of IL, but preferentially target CC neurons over cortico-pontine neurons in L5 of both IL and PL. Of all these neurons, we determine that vHPC inputs are most effective at driving action potential (AP) firing of CC neurons in L5 of IL. We also show this connection exhibits frequency-dependent facilitation, with repetitive activity enhancing AP firing of IL L5 CC neurons, even in the presence of feedforward inhibition. Our findings reveal how vHPC inputs engage defined populations of projection neurons in the PFC, allowing preferentially activation of the intratelencephalic network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available