4.7 Article

The metabolic and endocrine characteristics in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 265, Issue 5, Pages 1026-1036

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8790-2

Keywords

Kennedy's disease; Spinobulbar muscular atrophy; Motor neuron disease; Diabetes; Biomarker; MRI

Funding

  1. German Network of ALS [BMBF 01GM1103A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is caused by an abnormal expansion of the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor gene. This study aimed to systematically phenotype a German SBMA cohort (n = 80) based on laboratory markers for neuromuscular, metabolic, and endocrine status, and thus provide a basis for the selection of biomarkers for future therapeutic trials. We assessed a panel of 28 laboratory parameters. The clinical course and blood biomarkers were correlated with disease duration and CAG repeat length. A subset of 11 patients was evaluated with body fat MRI. Almost all patients reported muscle weakness (99%), followed by dysphagia (77%), tremor (76%), and gynecomastia (75%) as major complaints. Creatine kinase was the most consistently elevated (94%) serum marker, which, however, did not relate with either the disease duration or the CAG repeat length. Paresis duration and CAG repeat length correlated with dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate after correction for body mass index and age. The androgen insensitivity index was elevated in nearly half of the participants (48%). Metabolic alterations in glucose homeostasis (diabetes) and fat metabolism (combined hyperlipidemia), and sex hormone abnormalities (androgen insensitivity) could be observed among SBMA patients without association with the neuromuscular phenotype. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was the only biomarker that correlated strongly with both weakness duration and the CAG repeat length after adjusting for age and BMI, indicating its potential as a biomarker for both disease severity and duration and, therefore, its possible use as a reliable outcome measure in future therapeutic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available