4.7 Review

MOG-IgG in primary and secondary chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study of 200 patients and review of the literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1108-6

Keywords

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG); Antibodies; Immunoglobulin G; MOG-IgG; Primary chronic progressive MS (PPMS); Secondary chronic progressive MS (SPMS); Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)

Funding

  1. Dietmar Hopp Foundation, Germany
  2. Merck Serono, Germany
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis)
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  5. Baden-Wurttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts
  6. Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Exc 257]
  8. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Economy [BIG WIG MS]
  9. Austrian Research promotion Agency (FFG, Bridge 1 project) [853209 EDNA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Antibodies to human full-length myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) as detected by new-generation cell-based assays have recently been described in patients presenting with acute demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, including patients previously diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, only limited data are available on the relevance of MOG-IgG testing in patients with chronic progressive demyelinating disease. It is unclear if patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) should routinely be tested for MOG-IgG. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of MOG-IgG among patients classified as having PPMS or SPMS based on current diagnostic criteria. Methods: For this purpose, we retrospectively tested serum samples of 200 patients with PPMS or SPMS for MOG-IgG using cell-based assays. In addition, we performed a review of the entire English language literature on MOG-IgG published between 2011 and 2017. Results: None of 139 PPMS and 61 SPMS patients tested was positive for MOG-IgG. Based on a review of the literature, we identified 35 further MOG-IgG tests in patients with PPMS and 55 in patients with SPMS; the only reportedly positive sample was positive just at threshold level and was tested in a non-IgG-specific assay. In total, a single borderline positive result was observed among 290 tests. Conclusion: Our data suggest that MOG-IgG is absent or extremely rare among patients with PPMS or SPMS. Routine screening of patients with typical PPMS/SPMS for MOG-IgG seems not to be justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available