4.7 Review

MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2

Keywords

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies; Consensus recommendations; Diagnosis; Antibody testing; Multiple sclerosis (MS); Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD); Optic neuritis (ON); Myelitis

Funding

  1. Dietmar Hopp Foundation
  2. Merck Serono
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis)
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  5. Baden-Wurttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts
  6. Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM (red flags) that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available